Paul Scholes has once again thrown Manchester United into the spotlight with a striking claim that has shaken discussions about the club’s ongoing crisis. In the wake of United’s poor run of form, most of the criticism has been aimed at manager Ruben Amorim, who many believe has failed to get the best out of his squad. However, the former United midfielder sees things differently. Scholes insists that Amorim is being unfairly singled out and that the real issue lies within the playing squad—specifically, with one disruptive figure he believes is tarnishing the club from the inside.
Speaking with his usual bluntness, Scholes suggested it is misleading to continuously blame Amorim when there is a player within the dressing room whose negative influence is having a far greater impact. His comments have quickly ignited debate across the fanbase, with speculation running wild over who exactly the disruptive figure might be. Social media has been buzzing with guesses, highlighting the already fractured mood surrounding Old Trafford.
Amorim, who was brought in to implement a more disciplined and structured style of play, has faced constant criticism for failing to deliver results against top sides such as Manchester City, Arsenal, and Liverpool. Yet, Scholes argues that even the best tactical plans are destined to fail when unity in the squad is compromised. He believes Amorim has tried to instill order, but his work has been undermined by an individual whose poor attitude and toxic presence have made it impossible for the team to progress.
Scholes did not hold back, pointing out that this player is damaging Manchester United both on and off the pitch. While his performances have fallen short of expectations during key matches, his behavior behind the scenes has allegedly been even more harmful. The ex-midfielder warned that unless United’s hierarchy addresses this matter directly, the club’s struggles will persist, regardless of who sits in the manager’s seat.
The reaction among fans has been divided. Some supporters have sided with Scholes, arguing that certain players have been underperforming for years yet remain protected by their wages, reputations, or transfer value. Others, however, believe Scholes is simply deflecting attention away from Amorim’s tactical shortcomings and insist the manager deserves the criticism he has received.
The timing of Scholes’ remarks is significant, as reports suggest deep rifts already exist within the United dressing room. It is said that Amorim has clashed with senior players, with the mystery figure repeatedly failing to follow tactical instructions, disrupting team harmony, and faltering in decisive moments. Despite Amorim’s desire to offload the player, the club’s hierarchy appears reluctant to sanction his departure due to financial considerations.
With tensions escalating, the big question now is whether Manchester United’s board will finally confront the internal issues within the squad or continue to scapegoat Amorim for every setback. Scholes’ intervention has forced both fans and pundits to reconsider the root cause of United’s decline, suggesting the heart of the problem may lie not with the manager, but with the players themselves.
