Manchester United wasted little time in taking decisive action following their embarrassing 3–1 defeat to Brentford, with the board confirming the dismissal of Rúben Amorim as head coach. Reports indicate that the decision was reached within 30 minutes of the final whistle, underlining just how severely the hierarchy viewed the loss. What’s more, a replacement has already been lined up, with the official unveiling anticipated either later this evening or by tomorrow morning.
The humbling result at the Gtech Community Stadium was not merely seen as another disappointing performance; it was the tipping point. For United’s leadership, this latest collapse served as undeniable evidence of a squad in turmoil, despite the substantial financial backing Amorim received in the transfer market over the summer. Following the game, insiders confirm that an urgent boardroom meeting was convened, where the club’s part-owners INEOS also gave their input remotely before the final verdict was reached.
Amorim’s arrival at Old Trafford had originally been met with optimism. He came with a growing reputation after his success at Sporting CP, where his tactical innovation and fresh approach had turned heads across Europe. Many fans believed his appointment would ignite a new chapter at United. However, the reality has been starkly different. His reign has been defined by inconsistency, contentious team selections, and disappointing results. To make matters worse, prominent United legends such as Wayne Rooney and Rio Ferdinand openly voiced criticism of his methods, further eroding confidence in his leadership. Within just a few months, United found themselves adrift in the league, stumbling in European competition, and facing growing unrest among their supporters.
Even before the Brentford collapse, murmurs of dissatisfaction within the boardroom had begun to circulate, with suggestions that potential successors were already being sounded out behind the scenes. Now, multiple sources reveal that talks with Amorim’s replacement were nearly concluded before the final whistle blew in West London. The paperwork, they add, was completed shortly afterwards. This level of urgency reflects the club’s desire to re-establish order, calm fan unrest, and give the new manager sufficient time to prepare ahead of the next fixture.
The reaction among fans has been mixed. A portion of the United faithful see the sacking as long overdue, describing it as a necessary fresh start. Others, however, are alarmed by what they perceive as the club’s addiction to quick managerial fixes, raising concerns that the cycle of frequent turnover is undermining any chance of building long-term success. Questions now loom over how the incoming manager will shape tactics, handle the squad, and possibly reshape the transfer strategy.
Ultimately, this latest development adds yet another turbulent chapter to United’s post-Ferguson struggles. Each new appointment has been billed as the dawn of stability and progress, yet many have ended in frustration and disillusionment. Whether the next man in charge can truly deliver consistency and a clear identity remains to be seen. For now, tonight’s announcement is set to mark both the end of one failed experiment and the beginning of another high-stakes gamble in United’s ongoing quest to reclaim their former glory.
