Manchester United’s dressing room has once again been thrust into controversy following a surprising confession from Moroccan defender Noussair Mazraoui. In a candid revelation, the full-back admitted that the general belief surrounding Benjamin Sesko being the club’s sharpest striker in training is not entirely accurate. According to Mazraoui, another forward within the squad has consistently proven to be far more threatening during sessions, displaying superior sharpness, movement, and finishing ability. Yet, despite this, manager Ruben Amorim continues to prioritize Sesko as his first-choice option in crucial fixtures.
Mazraoui explained that facing this unnamed striker during practice is nothing short of a nightmare, stressing that his clinical edge and consistency stand out above the rest. His comments have ignited strong debates among supporters, who are now questioning why the player in question remains overlooked when United’s attack has been far from convincing in competitive matches. The remarks have fueled suspicions that Amorim might be guilty of favoritism or an overly rigid tactical approach, both of which are beginning to irritate fans already frustrated with the team’s lack of cutting edge in front of goal.
Benjamin Sesko, signed amid great expectations to become United’s attacking leader, has shown glimpses of his talent. However, inconsistency and struggles against top-level opposition have tarnished his progress. While many still believe the young striker has the potential to grow into the role, Mazraoui’s revelation has added to the growing perception that Amorim is too reluctant to adapt or reward players performing well in training.
Although the Moroccan defender refused to reveal the name of the forward, speculation has already run wild. Reports suggest that new signing Matheus Cunha could be the player he was referring to, as he has supposedly been unstoppable during training, particularly with his clever movement and decisive finishing. Others point towards Bryan Mbeumo, another summer addition, whose versatility and drive to impress make him a strong candidate. Regardless of who the player is, the underlying message is clear: United may be wasting a major attacking asset by leaving him out of the starting eleven.
Unsurprisingly, the fanbase has become divided. A section of supporters argue that Sesko should be immediately dropped in favor of the “mystery striker,” while others remain cautious, pointing out that excelling in training does not always equate to dominating in real matches. What seems more pressing, however, is the wider issue of Amorim’s selection choices, which have been repeatedly criticized since his arrival. His insistence on sticking with certain players, even when results suggest otherwise, has placed his decision-making under greater scrutiny.
Mazraoui’s remarks could easily cause ripples inside the squad, especially if players begin to feel overlooked despite putting in strong performances behind the scenes. The bigger question is whether Amorim will be willing to take a gamble on this overlooked forward or continue to rely on Sesko, risking further unrest among both fans and players.
One thing is undeniable: the conversation around United’s misfiring attack has now become impossible to ignore. With Mazraoui’s words shining a light on possible internal tension, Amorim will eventually be forced to confront the striker dilemma and decide whether change is needed to unlock United’s attacking potential.
