Brighton fans and players expressed frustration as a lesser-known VAR rule denied them a late corner in their attempt to equalize against Chelsea. Despite Enzo Fernandez scoring twice for the Blues in a 3-2 victory, Joao Pedro’s late goal added drama. Referee Craig Pawson initially appeared to award Brighton a penalty, but after a VAR check, he determined Levi Colwill, formerly on loan at Brighton, wasn’t guilty of a handball. The VAR rule stipulates that the game restarts from a drop ball when a decision is overturned, not from where the action stopped, leaving Brighton players irate as they were denied an opportunity from the set piece.
While some fans complained about perceived corruption, others acknowledged that Pawson followed the rules correctly. On social media, one fan expressed frustration, stating, “VAR should (wrongly) suggest an on-field review for handball,” questioning the decision not to grant a corner. Another user explained the law, noting that if VAR calls back a penalty, the ball is dropped and given to the goalkeeper. Amid differing opinions, some argued that the referee made the right call, urging Brighton fans to accept the outcome despite their team scoring two first-half goals, ultimately leaving London empty-handed.
Chelsea secured their victory with goals from Fernandez and Conor Gallagher’s dismissal, but Brighton’s Facundo Buonanotte narrowed the gap. Despite a penalty from Fernandez in the 65th minute, Joao Pedro’s 92nd-minute goal made for an exciting finish. Brighton, unable to score a third goal, now faces three consecutive home games against Brentford, Burnley, and Marseille in the Europa League group stage. The disappointment lingers for Brighton, who missed a chance to secure points at Stamford Bridge due to the controversial VAR decision.
