Erling Haaland may face disciplinary action under FA Rule E3.1 if his social media post criticizing referee Simon Hooper’s decision during a match is deemed improper or bringing the game into disrepute. The rule encompasses comments that are threatening, abusive, indecent, or insulting, especially those targeting match officials. If the FA chooses to investigate, Haaland would be given an opportunity to provide written comments or face charges within three business days of the post being brought to their attention.
Following this, Haaland has another three business days to respond to any notes requested. The FA would then take three working days to decide on charging him with a violation. Subsequently, Haaland has an additional three working days to respond to the charge. The Regulatory Commission meeting, determining the outcome, would occur within ten business days of Haaland’s response. Given potential delays during the holiday season, a ruling might extend until January 5, after which Haaland could consider filing an appeal.
Players are held accountable for content on their social media accounts per FA rules, and deleting the post or claiming someone else made it would not exempt Haaland from potential punishment. While the FA acknowledges no set penalties for social media statements, financial penalties are commonly imposed in such cases. This suggests that, if investigated, charged, and penalized, Haaland may not face a ban. The FA’s stance on the matter is yet to be revealed.
