In the first half of the Champions League clash between Manchester United and Copenhagen at Parken Stadium, Marcus Rashford faced a surprising turn of events with an unexpected red card. Returning to the lineup after a brief injury-related absence, Rashford’s presence took a negative turn as he failed to complete the first half, contrasting with Rasmus Hojlund’s commendable performance for Copenhagen.
The red card incident unfolded during a collision with Copenhagen defender Elias Jellert. Initially, referee Donatas Rumsas did not grasp the severity of the situation. However, a VAR review was initiated to assess the potential for a red card, prompting the referee to reevaluate.
Examining the pitchside monitor, Rumsas observed Rashford’s attempt to shield the ball from Jellert’s pressure. In the process, Rashford’s foot crossed the ball, making contact with Jellert’s ankle as he sought to retain possession for Manchester United.
In the slowed-down footage, the contact appeared more impactful, causing the defender’s foot to bend unnaturally. While Rashford’s intent was not malicious, the referee deemed the action careless and endangering an opponent, resulting in a red card.
Former Manchester United players Owen Hargreaves and Paul Scholes, present in the TNT Sports studio, vehemently defended Rashford. Hargreaves argued it wasn’t a red card, emphasizing Rashford’s attempt to move his leg towards the ball without malicious intent. Scholes highlighted the accidental nature of the incident, where Rashford was trying to protect the ball by planting his foot.
The unexpected red card sparked debates over the appropriate application of red cards in situations involving unintentional but impactful collisions, with the former United players questioning the referee’s interpretation and the absence of malicious intent.